Book: How to Win Friends ; Step-12

Published: 1937 & Pages: 320

33x Step Learning

PART-3 of 4
How to Win People

Principle - 1 (Total:12)
Steer Clear of Arguments

Avoiding arguments is crucial, as winning or losing both lead to negative outcomes. If you triumph, you may feel good, but you make the other person feel inferior, damaging their pride and fostering resentment. Arguments, as Carnegie emphasizes, offer nothing to gain and everything to lose. They can break friendships, end marriages, and even escalate to wars, causing grief and sadness. Winning an argument might seem satisfying, but the defeated person, feeling embarrassed and hurt, often harbors resentment. Carnegie questions the value of proving someone wrong, especially if it damages the relationship. Even if you’re right, the aftermath may include anger and a desire for revenge. The loser may think, “So what if you were right? Did you have to embarrass me? Just wait for payback!” Thus, Carnegie advocates avoiding arguments, preserving others’ dignity, and recognizing the potential consequences of pushing one’s point. Ultimately, fostering understanding and maintaining relationships outweigh the short-lived satisfaction of winning an argument.

بسم اللہ الرحمان الرحیم،
اردو ترجمہ جلد اپ لوڈ کیا جاےَ گا، انشاء اللہ

10x Short Questions

1. Why does Carnegie argue that winning an argument can still lead to losing?

Winning an argument can make the other person feel inferior and resentful, causing damage to the relationship.

2. What negative emotions might the person who lost the argument experience?

The person may feel embarrassed, uncomfortable, hurt in pride, and possibly angry towards the winner.

3. According to Carnegie, what can arguments break and damage?

Arguments can break friendships, marriages, and cause grief, sadness, resentment, and even lead to wars.

4. Why does Carnegie stress that arguments offer nothing to gain and everything to lose?

Even if you win an argument, the other person may resent you, leading to damaged relationships and negative consequences.

5. How does Carnegie describe the potential aftermath of proving someone wrong?

The person who lost may feel embarrassed and seek revenge, harboring negative emotions.

6. What does Carnegie suggest happens to relationships when constant arguing occurs?

Constant arguing can lead to broken friendships and marriages, causing grief and resentment.

7. Why does Carnegie question the value of proving someone wrong, even if you are right?

Proving someone wrong in an argument doesn’t enhance relationships; it often leads to resentment and negative feelings.

8. What consequences can arise from damaging someone's pride during an argument?

Damaging pride in an argument may lead to anger, discomfort, and a desire for revenge from the person who lost.

9. According to the paragraph, what is the alternative to winning an argument?

The alternative is to avoid arguments and let the other person save face, maintaining positive relationships.

10. What lesson does Carnegie emphasize about the satisfaction of winning an argument?

Winning an argument provides momentary satisfaction but risks damaging relationships and causing long-term negative consequences.

Check Your Knowledge
10x MCQs

0

Book Summary How to Win Friends & Influence People Test-12 (QM)

Book Summary How to Win Friends & Influence People Test-12 (QM)

The number of attempts remaining is 100

1 / 10

1. According to Carnegie, what can arguments break and damage?

2 / 10

2. What negative emotions might the person who lost the argument experience?

3 / 10

3. What does Carnegie suggest happens to relationships when constant arguing occurs?

4 / 10

4. Why does Carnegie stress that arguments offer nothing to gain and everything to lose?

5 / 10

5. Why does Carnegie argue that winning an argument can still lead to losing?

6 / 10

6. According to the paragraph, what is the alternative to winning an argument?

7 / 10

7. What lesson does Carnegie emphasize about the satisfaction of winning an argument?

8 / 10

8. What consequences can arise from damaging someone's pride during an argument?

9 / 10

9. How does Carnegie describe the potential aftermath of proving someone wrong?

10 / 10

10. Why does Carnegie question the value of proving someone wrong, even if you are right?

Your score is

0%

Exit

Thank You for Your Judgement!!!

NEXT STEP

HOW TO WIN FRIENDS STEP - 13

NEXT STEP

HOW TO WIN FRIENDS STEP - 13
NEXT STEP

PREVIOUS STEP

HOW TO WIN FRIENDS STEP - 11

PREVIOUS STEP

HOW TO WIN FRIENDS STEP - 11
PREVIOUS STEP

Buy Online Now