Published: 2018 & Pages: 484
“Many people in the West are feeling disenchanted with traditional leaders, and elites are now facing increased criticism. But contrary to common belief, being part of an elite isn’t inherently wrong. Elitism doesn’t always mean privilege by birth—it can be about recognizing and rewarding excellence. Consider Cornelius Vanderbilt, an American who built the country’s first railways, making essential goods cheaper for everyone. His success benefited the whole nation. However, elites can become too powerful if not kept in check. This happened in the Republic of Venice, which started as a meritocracy but later allowed hereditary rule, ending its fair selection process. Venice’s downfall teaches an important lesson: even if you want the best to lead, there must be rules to control their power. John Adams, a Founding Father, highlighted the need to restrain elite desires. That’s why the U.S. was designed with three branches of government, each meant to prevent abuse of power by the others. Unfortunately, the checks and balances created by the Founding Fathers have weakened over time in America, leading to a less meritocratic ruling class.” |
بسم اللہ الرحمان الرحیم
اردو ترجمہ جلد اپ لوڈ کیا جاےَ گا، انشاءاللہ
Disenchantment and increased criticism.
No, it’s not inherently wrong.
He built the first railways in the U.S., benefiting the entire nation, highlighting the potential positive impact of elites.
It eventually allowed hereditary rule, abandoning its fair selection process.
Even when aiming for the best leaders, rules to control their power are crucial.
The need to restrain the desires of the elite to prevent abuse of power.
By establishing three branches of government to check and balance each other.
They have weakened, leading to a less meritocratic ruling class.
He built the country’s first railways, making essential goods cheaper for everyone.
Striking a balance between elite leadership and regulating their power is crucial for a stable society.